Member-only story

Embedding an Image is Not a Copyright Violation: US Court

Canva

One of the strange legal questions that always followed around social media was the copyright status of an embed. An embed — an image or video which is displayed on a web page, but the content itself is pulled from another web server.

Certainly, if you just copy a photographer’s image and slap it on your brand’s site, that’s a violation of copyright. But what if you embed it instead, from a public platform like Instagram.

Well, a new ruling by an American court has found that embedding images on third-party sites does not necessarily constitute copyright infringement as they are not direct copies of the original content but rather HTML code that serves as a link to where the original photo is stored.

The case started as a class action lawsuit filed by two photographers in 2021 against Instagram, alleging that the platform violated their copyright by letting news outlets embed photos they posted on their accounts without proper licensing. Their lawyers argued that Instagram’s practices misled third parties into thinking they had permission to use copyrighted material.

⚖️ Appeals Court Decision

Initially, a California judge dismissed the suit last year, saying that the news outlets were not displaying actual copies of the photos…

--

--

Tod Maffin - Today in Digital Marketing
Tod Maffin - Today in Digital Marketing

Written by Tod Maffin - Today in Digital Marketing

A fast-paced daily 10-minute marketing news podcast covering everything you missed in the world of digital marketing, e-commerce, and social media that day.

No responses yet